Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again). Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again). Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, March 03, 2008

Obama Opens His Mouth Again, Bad Things Follow

It seems lately that every time Barack Obama opens his mouth he says something mind-numbingly dumb. In case you missed it last week:

Previously at Limes: Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again); Updated

Now we have this. Yesterday in a speech Obama slammed Hillary Clinton for not reading the National Intelligence Report prior to her vote of approval for the Iraq war. The Senator from Illinois then went on to compare her actions to that of Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia claiming that he had read the NIE report, which Rockefeller had, too bad he voted for the war also just as Clinton did.
WESTERVILLE, Ohio — Clinton campaign officials have accused Democratic rival Barack Obama of making a ‘flub’ during an Ohio speech in which he described the Iraq war vote cast by a leading senator who endorsed him.

Obama criticized Clinton expressly for failing to read the classified National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq’s weapons capabilities, a report available at the time of her October 2002 vote authorizing the Iraq war.

He said that Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a fellow Democrat from neighboring West Virginia, had read the intelligence estimate as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and after a brief pause said the then-chairman had voted against the war resolution.

However, Rockefeller was not the chair at the time and voted in favor of the war authorization. Sen. Bob Graham of Florida was the intelligence committee chair in 2002 and voted against the resolution. Obama did not mention Graham’s name in the passage.

“She didn’t read the National Intelligence Estimates. Jay Rockefeller read it. But she didn’t read it. (And after a 13-second pause) I don’t know what all that experience got her because I have enough experience to know that if you have a National Intelligence Estimate and the chairman of the national…umm…Senate Intelligence Committee says you should read this, this is why I’m voting against the war, that you should probably read it. I don’t know how much experience you need for that.”
And then we have the Washington Post covering for their candidate. In this report from the W.P. you find nothing about Obama's latest gaffe while trying to appear candid and intelligent.
WESTERVILLE, Ohio - Sen. Barack Obama shot down his rival's contention that his candidacy is built around his Iraq opposition and leveled a direct challenge to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's claim to lengthy foreign policy credentials.

Speaking this afternoon at a local high school, at the start of a packed town hall meeting, Obama was unusually blunt and emphatic, underscoring the intensity of these final campaign days before the big Texas and Ohio showdowns on Tuesday.

"Now in the last few days, Sen. Clinton goes running around telling people that the entire campaign, according to her, is only based on the fact that I gave a speech in opposition to the war in Iraq from the start," Obama said. "That that is the only basis of my campaign, and on the other hand she has, supposedly, all this vast foreign policy experience."

He continued, "I have to say that when it came to making the most important foreign policy decision of our generation, the decision to invade Iraq, Sen. Clinton got it wrong."

Obama noted that Clinton had cast her 2002 authorization vote without reading the 90-page classified National Intelligence Estimate, which raised serious enough concerns that former Sen. Bob Graham, then-chair of the Senate intelligence panel, cited the NIE as a reason he voted against the war.

"I don't know what all that experience got her, because I have the experience to know that...if the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee says you should read this, this is why I voted against the war, then you should probably read it," said Obama.

"We're still waiting to hear Sen. Clinton tell us what precise foreign policy experience that she is claiming, that makes her prepared to answer that phone call at three in the morning," Obama said to deafening cheers, a reference to Clinton's "red phone" television ad, running until Tuesday in Texas.
Objectionable reporting right? I'm currently looking for video of the speech at the townhall meeting. When I find it I will be sure to update this post. If you happen to find it online before it's posted here please feel free to send me the link, full credit will be given where it is due.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again); Updated

Here are two videos of Barrack Obama giving two speeches not even a full 24 hours apart and yet he still manages to contradict himself. The first clip is from the latest Democratic debate on Feb. 26, 2008 in Ohio. Tim Russert asks Obama and Clinton a "hypothetical" question about re-invading Iraq if they were to pull troops out, like they claim they will, and then Al Qaeda were to take over.

Here is Obama's response. At 1:15 into the clip he states "if Al Qaeda is forming a base in Iraq then we will have to act in a way that secures the American homeland and our interests abroad".


John McCain then proceeded to call Mr. Obama out on this statement telling him that "I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq. It's called `al-Qaida in Iraq,'"

Now here is Senator Obama's response to Senator McCain's statement. Note the demeaning way he addresses the crowd; "this is how politics works". At 1:08 Sen. Obama claims that he does know Al Qaeda is in Iraq.

"Like I wasn't reading the papers, like I didn't know what was going on"...

Well Senator Obama, according to your statement from 24 hours before as seen in the first clip it does not appear that you know "what" is going on.

Question of the day.
Is it President George Bush's, or V.P. Dick Cheney's, or Senator John McCain's fault(s) that there exists Al Qaeda in Europe, Al Qaeda in North Africa, or Al Qaeda in Indonesia, [also here], considering the we haven't invaded any of those regions? Too bad Senator Barrack Obama will never be asked such a question by a member of the media.

Update 1
Peter Smith at The Huffington Post blames Tim Russert for Obama's "flap".
Lost in the mainstream media coverage of the McCain-Obama dust up about Al Qaeda in Iraq is any mention of the role Tim Russert played in initiating the imbroglio.

Like the little manager man in pro wrestling - the one who tosses the folding chair into the ring when the ref isn't looking - he slipped McCain something to hit Obama with. And like the little manager man, he got away with it.

"Who...? Me...?"

It was Russert who asked Hillary Clinton (and then Obama) if, having pulled American troops out of Iraq, they would re-invade if Al Qaeda were to establish a base of operations there. Two hypothetical questions. An if and an if.
Just another illustration of how Obama followers will not allow anything to get in the way of the fairy tale being sown that is Obamamania. Mr. Smith and others better get ready for more of this. If Obama is the Democrat that is chosen to go up against McCamnesty in the general election then there will be more of this to come, much more.

2/28/2008 3:43pm EDT

Saturday, March 01, 2008

When Considering Foreign Policy, Hope is Not Enough

Change!
Now that he seems poised to become the Democratic Presidential nominee, Obama is taking a bit of heat from McCain, his likely opponent, especially about Obama’s touchy-feely (that is, predominantly talky) foreign policy.

It’s a different sort of heat than Clinton can give out, because the audience is different. Hillary can’t criticize Obama’s extreme liberal positions, nor his antiwar stance, all that effectively, for the simple reason that in order to have a chance at her party’s nomination she needs to appeal to the huge number of Democrats who agree with those very positions...

...“Not afraid to talk” is a clever phrase, designed to portray those who won’t cozy up and have a “dialogue” as being motivated by fear rather than practical reality or strategic considerations. Obama is nothing if not clever. But he certainly is naive.
Actually, I'm not sure if I would describe Obama as clever. Last week he managed to show what happens when he talks too much.

Previously at Limes: Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again); Updated

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Another Historic Iraqi Election Day

Hey Harry, is the war still lost?
"It is time to bring the war to a close."

-Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi in a letter to President George W. Bush and the United States Armed Forces, April 2007
Well, nearly two years later after that letter demanding surrender to al Qaeda and other Islamists reaping terror across the Iraqi landscape, Iraqi citizens are headed to the polls once again.

Photo: LA Times
It could be weeks before the outcome of Iraq's first provincial elections since 2005 are known, but as voting was held Saturday, those taking part -- either as voters or election workers -- were eager to have their voices heard. Here are some of them:

Ali Alwan, a government employee at a polling station in Fallujah: "I walked four kilometers (2.5 miles) to get here. It's a bit far, but I feel good. I will vote for the honest people who will serve this oppressed city."

Ahmed Farhan, auto parts dealer in Fallujah: "I came to vote for Ali Zigam, who is from Tawafuk (Sunni Arab political bloc). This person is an honest one ... a real Iraqi. He didn't come with those who came in with American tanks to rule Iraq. I walked a long time to give my vote. It's worth the effort."

Talba Getan, a housewife from Sadr City: "At first, me and my sons decided not to vote, but when Muqtada Sadr (the anti-U.S. Shiite cleric) asked us to vote for the Ahrar Bloc, we decided to vote for it. I have chosen a female candidate to vote for from that bloc ... To be frank, I don't have great hopes that the people we voted for today will bring change. The people we elected before also did nothing for us."

Ahmed Makhi Badr, an election worker in Najaf: "I volunteered to do this for freedom, and to serve democracy," Badr said as sleepy-eyed election volunteers waited for voters to show up shortly after polls opened at 7 a.m.
Limes Flashbacks|Democratic Leaders Invested in American & Iraqi Defeat:
Harry Reid and other Dems Claim "War is Lost"

Dems to Bush: "Surge has Failed"

NYT Claims Good News in Iraq, That Means Bad News for Some Dems

Pelosi's Iraq-Derangement Syndrome Continues

Another Obama Foreign Policy Gaffe, MSM Ignores It (Again); Updated

Also see: Victory in Iraq Day